Dupilumab for Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Characterizing Symptoms and Clinical Outcomes in a Real-World Pediatric Population

1 Patient Characteristics

Characteristic N N = 1171
Age at first fill 117
    Mean (SD)
12.4 (3.8)
    Median (IQR)
13.0 (9.5, 15.7)
    Range
3.6, 18.7
Sex 117
    Male
90 (76.9%)
    Female
27 (23.1%)
Race 117
    White
95 (81.2%)
    Black or African American
13 (11.1%)
    Hispanic/Latino/a
5 (4.27%)
    Middle Eastern or North African
2 (1.71%)
    American Indian or Alaska Native
1 (0.85%)
    None of these
1 (0.85%)
Ethnicity 117
    Not Hispanic, Latino/a, or Spanish origin
81 (69.2%)
    Other
16 (13.7%)
    None of these
13 (11.1%)
    Other Hispanic, Latino/a, or Spanish origin
6 (5.13%)
    Decline to Answer/Prefer not to answer
1 (0.85%)
Pharmacy insurance 117
    Commercial
56 (47.9%)
    Medicaid
52 (44.4%)
    Tricare
9 (7.69%)
Height-age-Z score at baseline as of clinic date 116
    Mean (SD)
0.10 (1.25)
    Median (IQR)
0.15 (-0.71, 0.93)
    Range
-4.73, 3.10
    Missing
1
Weight-age Z score at basline as of clinic date 117
    Mean (SD)
0.33 (1.35)
    Median (IQR)
0.24 (-0.64, 1.29)
    Range
-3.30, 3.07
Does the patient have a diagnosis of autism? 117
    No
100 (85.5%)
    Yes
17 (14.5%)
Diagnosis of GERD at initiation 117
    No
40 (34.2%)
    Yes
77 (65.8%)
On a dietary therapy at initiation? 117
    No
76 (65.0%)
    Yes
41 (35.0%)
Time from date of diagnosis to start of therapy (years) 116
    Mean (SD)
3.79 (3.35)
    Median (IQR)
3.07 (1.09, 5.02)
    Range
0.08, 16.17
    Missing
1
Turnaround time (days) 117
    Mean (SD)
12 (36)
    Median (IQR)
5 (2, 10)
    Range
0, 373
1 n (%)

2 Outcomes of Interest

2.1 Rate of Dysphagia

Characteristic N = 1171
Dysphagia outcome
    Dysphagia 59 (50.4%)
    No dysphagia and no compensatory mechanisms 50 (42.7%)
    Compensatory mechanisms without dysphagia 8 (6.84%)
1 n (%)

2.2 Symptoms at baseline

Symptoms at baseline Total (N = 117)
Dysphagia 59 (50%)
Stomach pain 29 (25%)
Compensatory mechanisms 22 (19%)
Asymptomatic 17 (15%)
Vomiting 16 (14%)
Food stuck in throat 15 (13%)
Heartburn 11 (9%)
Acid reflux 10 (9%)
Regurgitations 8 (7%)
Food refusal 7 (6%)
Other 1 (1%)

2.3 Histological status at baseline

Histological findings patient had at baseline EGD Total (N = 116)
Distal Esophagus 115 (99%)
Mid Esophagus 75 (65%)
Proximal Esophagus 44 (38%)

Characteristic N N = 1171
Peak esophageal intraepithelial eosinophil count 116
    <15
10 (8.62%)
    >=15
106 (91.4%)
    N/A
1
1 n (%)

2.4 Endoscopic Findings at baseline

Endoscopic findings at baseline Total (N = 101)
Furrows 83 (82%)
Edema 66 (65%)
Exudates 50 (50%)
Rings 15 (15%)
Unavailable 7 (7%)
Strictures 3 (3%)

2.5 Dilations at baseline

Characteristic N = 1171
Number of dilations in 6 months prior to dupilumab initiation
    0 109 (93.2%)
    1 6 (5.13%)
    2 1 (0.85%)
    Unknown 1 (0.85%)
1 n (%)

2.6 Concomitant medications at baseline

2.6.1 Summary

Concomitant medications at baseline Total (N = 117)
PPI 82 (70%)
Swallowed topical corticosteroids 76 (65%)
None 13 (11%)
Dupilumab for other condition or EoE 6 (5%)

2.6.2 PPI

Characteristic N = 1171
PPI Action
    Continued 59 (72.0%)
    Dose reduced 1 (1.22%)
    Stopped 22 (26.8%)
    N/A 35
1 n (%)
Reason no longer taking PPI (not taking at initiation) Total (N = 29)
Not effective 15 (52%)
Nonahderence 6 (21%)
Unknown 5 (17%)
Affordability 1 (3%)
Adverse effects experienced 1 (3%)
Adverse effect concerns (not yet experienced) 1 (3%)

2.6.3 Swallowed topical corticosteroids

Characteristic N = 1171
Swallowed steroids Action
    Continued 33 (43.4%)
    Dose reduced 2 (2.63%)
    Stopped 41 (53.9%)
    N/A 41
1 n (%)
Reason no longer taking swallowed steroids (not taking at initiation) Total (N = 27)
Not effective 8 (30%)
Nonahderence 7 (26%)
Adverse effects experienced 6 (22%)
Unknown 3 (11%)
De-escalated due to prior improvement 3 (11%)
Adverse effect concerns (not yet experienced) 1 (4%)

2.6.4 PPI and Swallowed Steroids sankeys

2.7 Reasons for initiation

Reason for starting Total (N = 117)
Failure of PPI and steroid 62 (53%)
Multiple Type 2 comorbidities 23 (20%)
Failure of previous PPI (only) 20 (17%)
Nonadherence to previous therapies 17 (15%)
Not able to taper off other therapies 15 (13%)
Side effects (experienced or concerns for) 12 (10%)
Other 9 (8%)
Failure of previous steroids (only) 8 (7%)
Not able to tolerate (spit out, vomit up, etc) 5 (4%)

2.8 Type 2 inflammatory conditions at baseline

Baseline Type 2 inflammatory conditions Total (N = 117)
Allergic rhinitis 70 (60%)
Food allergies 59 (50%)
Asthma 58 (50%)
Atopic dermatitis 51 (44%)
None 23 (20%)

2.9 Third party denials

Reasons for 3rd party denials Total (N = 40)
Below FDA-approved age-weight (appropriate) 18 (45%)
Frequency and/or severity of dysphagia 15 (38%)
Below FDA-approved age-weight (inappropriate) 6 (15%)
Have not failed topical steroids 5 (12%)
In remission on current therapies 3 (8%)
Have not tried elimination diet 1 (2%)
Have not failed PPI 1 (2%)
Exceeds quantity limit 1 (2%)

Table 2.1: Table 2.2: Summary of Multivariable Logistic Regression
Odds Ratio 95% CI P-value
Dysphagia 0.48 (0.22, 1.06) 0.070
Government insurance 1.41 (0.63, 3.14) 0.400
Weight z-score 0.86 (0.64, 1.15) 0.302

2.10 Time to Insurance Approval

Table 2.3: Table 2.4: Cox Proportional Hazards Model Summary
HR 95% CI- Lower 95% CI- Upper P-value
Dysphagia 1.457 1.001 2.120 0.049
Government insurance 1.061 0.724 1.554 0.762
Weight z-score 1.028 0.878 1.204 0.728